What is it?
Agent defense and response for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Antigravity, and more.
Gensee Crate protects Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Antigravity, and Copilot coding environments with long-horizon runtime agent defense, transactional workspaces, and customized deployments for your existing security and developer practices.
Gensee Crate helps enterprises safely adopt AI coding agents in real developer environments, where agents work across repos, terminals, credentials, files, package managers, MCP tools, and long-running engineering sessions.
Agent defense and response for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Antigravity, and more.
Long-horizon defense plus transactional workspaces for full-session protection and safe rollback.
Unsafe multi-step behavior, credential exposure, risky commands, policy bypass, and delayed side effects.
Customized deployments that fit each company's security stack, developer workflow, and agent practices.
Follow a coding-agent workflow from the first operational signal to the policy that governs what can happen next.
Sessions, requests, tool activity, and security signals arrive in one operational view so unusual behavior stands out without losing the surrounding context.
The timeline preserves what each agent attempted, which tools it invoked, and how long work ran across concurrent sessions.
Transaction dependencies expose every branch and merge, so teams can keep validated work and discard risky changes before they reach the source workspace.
Lineage connects agents, files, generated artifacts, and production state so teams can see where a sensitive output came from and what it influenced.
Resource limits, network boundaries, and approval rules meet the action before it changes files, reaches external systems, or affects production.
Coding-agent risk is rarely just one prompt. Gensee Crate follows the path from user request to tool call, command, file access, credential use, network activity, and later side effects so unsafe multi-step behavior can be stopped before harm occurs.
Agent risk is not always a single bad request. It can be planted in memory, hidden in a skill, carried through an artifact, and triggered days later by a benign-looking task.
A web page, repo, or dependency convinces the agent to save a helpful memory, modify a skill, or leave behind a shell helper.
The agent returns to the project, reads local context, invokes tools, and unknowingly follows the poisoned instruction path.
A file is staged, a secret is touched, a process runs, or a network request leaves the machine. A single-session scanner sees only the final action.
Crate links requests, memories, skill edits, tool calls, artifacts, process launches, file effects, and network activity into one policy-aware trace.
Memory writes, skill changes, generated scripts, hooks, and executable artifacts become policy surfaces, not invisible agent state.
When Crate blocks or asks for approval, teams can see the chain that made the action risky, not just the last command.
Agents can explore multiple approaches in isolated managed environments before selected changes are promoted back to the main workspace. Risky or speculative work can be discarded without leaving the developer environment in an unsafe state.
Create parallel coding environments with repo state, agent context, files, and runtime workspace state.
Let agents test several implementation paths at once without committing every attempt to the main workspace.
Review agent changes, behavior, and policy events before deciding what should move forward.
Promote selected work or discard unsafe speculative state when policy or review catches a problem.
Preliminary AgentCanary Benchmark results show Gensee Crate improving defense rate across threat types.
* Results tested on MacOS running Claude Code with Qwen-3.5-397B model.
Gensee Crate works with the coding agents and developer environments teams already use, without forcing enterprises to rebuild their agent stack around a security SDK.
Start with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and MCP-style tool use as they run today, instead of rebuilding the agent stack around a security SDK.
Designed for where coding agents actually run: developer machines, cloud instances, and managed agent runners.
Observe and interpose around tools, files, network, execution, memory, skills, and artifacts without sitting in the user's way.
Targets low false positives and interactive latency, so protection stays practical for real coding sessions instead of slowing developers down.
The same runtime layer feeds company-set policy, dashboards, audit timelines, identity, endpoint tooling, MCP control, SIEM, and internal developer systems.
Enterprise AI and security teams are asking for defenses that understand coding-agent sessions, prevent unsafe multi-step behavior, and fit existing engineering practices.
“We seek solutions from GenseeAI for in-depth, long-horizon defense for our company-wide AI agent system.”
AI Security Team from a hyperscale IT company
GenseeAI partners with EigentAI and CamelAI, is backed by research from UCSD WukLab, with venture backing from TSFV.
Gensee Crate combines long-horizon defense, transactional workspaces, and enterprise controls for company-wide AI coding-agent adoption.
Centralize company-wide policy, dashboards, audit timelines, telemetry, and evidence across developer machines, cloud instances, and managed agent runners.
Integrate Gensee Crate with each company's endpoint, identity, MCP, SIEM, code-hosting, and developer workflow practices instead of forcing a new agent stack.
Book a demo to see Gensee Crate around Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, MCP tools, credentials, terminal commands, transactional workspaces, and company-specific security workflows. The open-source endpoint safety tool is available on GitHub for local trials.